[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110527131313.GB8053@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2011 09:13:13 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@...curity.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davej@...hat.com, kees.cook@...onical.com, davem@...emloft.net,
eranian@...gle.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
adobriyan@...il.com, penberg@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
pageexec@...email.hu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Randomize kernel base address on boot
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:44:34PM -0400, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 16:40 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 04:35:02PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 04:31:45PM -0400, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> > > > This introduces CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_BASE, which randomizes the address at
> > > > which the kernel is decompressed at boot as a security feature that
> > > > deters exploit attempts relying on knowledge of the location of kernel
> > > > internals. The default values of the kptr_restrict and dmesg_restrict
> > > > sysctls are set to (1) when this is enabled, since hiding kernel
> > > > pointers is necessary to preserve the secrecy of the randomized base
> > > > address.
> > >
> > > What happens to /proc/iomem interface which gives us the physical memory
> > > location where kernel is loaded. kexec-tools relies on that interface
> > > heavily so we can not take it away. And if we can not take it away then
> > > I think somebody should be easibly be able to calculate this randomized
> > > base address.
>
> Is it common to run kexec-tools as non-root? It may be necessary to
> restrict this interface to root when randomization is used (keep in mind
> nobody's going to force you to turn this on by default, at least for the
> foreseeable future).
Dan,
I had a stupid question. /proc/kallsyms is also readable by root only. So
if we are doing this so that non-root user can not know kernel virtual and
physical address that should be already covered as non-root users can't
read /proc/kallsysm or /boot/System.map.
And if this randomization is also to protect information from root user
then /proc/iomem exporting the physical address of kernel is still a
valid question in that context.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists