[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTind_F4-5sLUO1GVxK_yY_eXz_J0Vg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 12:28:17 -0400
From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
Cc: kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kgdb-bugreport] [PATCH] kgdbts: only use new asm-generic/ptrace.h
api when needed
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 05:51, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 28-05-2011 18:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> The new instruction_pointer_set helper is defined for people who have
>> converted to asm-generic/ptrace.h, so don't use it generally unless
>> the arch needs it (in which case it has been converted). This should
>> fix building of kgdb tests for arches not yet converted.
>
>> --- a/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/kgdbts.c
>> @@ -304,7 +304,10 @@ static int check_and_rewind_pc(char *put_str, char
>> *arg)
>> return 1;
>> }
>> /* Readjust the instruction pointer if needed */
>> - instruction_pointer_set(&kgdbts_regs, ip + offset);
>> + ip += offset;
>
> Since 'íp' is local, incrementing it is pointless here unless you have
> GDB_ADJUSTS_BREAK_OFFSET defined. Why not keep instruction_pointer_set()
> call as is?
i prefer to have as much outside of ifdefs as possible. gcc optimizes
the result away, so it isnt a code size problem.
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists