[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DE305FD.4040503@samsung.com>
Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 19:50:37 -0700
From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To: Kyungmin Park <kmpark@...radead.org>
CC: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: gpio: gpio-exynos4 build fails in mainline
On 05/29/11 18:24, Kyungmin Park wrote:
> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Randy Dunlap<rdunlap@...otime.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 May 2011 08:40:00 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
(snip)
>>
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-s5pv210.c:17:11: error: unable to open 'plat/gpio-core.h'
>
Hi all,
Grrr, :(
> Hi,
>
> Right, now it's just moved from mach directories to drivers/gpio
> So it requires the proper depends on each ARCH_CPU.
>
Please add me in Cc on this.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> index 5923976..655babf 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> @@ -88,24 +88,28 @@ config GPIO_IT8761E
>
> config GPIO_EXYNOS4
> bool "Samsung Exynos4 GPIO library support"
> + depends on CPU_EXYNOS4210
> default y if CPU_EXYNOS4210
> help
> Say yes here to support Samsung Exynos4 series SoCs GPIO library
Basically, GPIO_EXYNOS4 is used only for EXYNOS4(EXYNOS4210) and was
selected as a default on EXYNOS4 before moving into drivers/. I mean, do
we really need to select this manually in kernel configuration(like make
menuconfig)?
And I think, it's more reasonable that depends on ARCH_XXX not CPU_XXX.
Grant, how about following?
+config GPIO_EXYNOS4
+ bool
+ depends on ARCH_EXYNOS4
+ default y if CPU_EXYNOS4210
>
> config GPIO_PLAT_SAMSUNG
> bool "Samsung SoCs GPIO library support"
> + depends on SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
> default y if SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
> help
> Say yes here to support Samsung SoCs GPIO library
>
Same as above.
+config GPIO_PLAT_SAMSUNG
+ bool
+ depends on PLAT_SAMSUNG
+ default y if SAMSUNG_GPIOLIB_4BIT
> config GPIO_S5PC100
> bool "Samsung S5PC100 GPIO library support"
> + depends on CPU_S5PC100
> default y if CPU_S5PC100
> help
> Say yes here to support Samsung S5PC100 SoCs GPIO library
>
Same...
+config GPIO_S5PC100
+ bool
+ depends on ARCH_S5PC100
+ default y if CPU_S5PC100
> config GPIO_S5PV210
> bool "Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 GPIO library support"
> + depends on CPU_S5PV210
> default y if CPU_S5PV210
> help
> Say yes here to support Samsung S5PV210/S5PC110 SoCs GPIO library
>
Same.
+config GPIO_S5PV210
+ bool
+ depends on ARCH_S5PV210
+ default y if CPU_S5PV210
One more, IMHO, would be better if they could not split like following.
As you know, 'PLAT_SAMSUNG' includes common GPIOlib for other Samsung SoCs.
config GPIO_PLAT_SAMSUNG
...
config GPIO_S5PC100
...
config GPIO_S5PV210
...
config GPIO_EXYNOS4
...
Thanks.
Best regards,
Kgene.
--
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>, Senior Engineer,
SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists