[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110531151019.GA32275@S2100-06.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 23:10:20 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: mxc: migrate mach-mx5 gpio driver to gpio-mxc
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 01:28:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 31 May 2011, Shawn Guo wrote:
> > > Just open-code the mxc_add_mxc_gpio() by moving the individual calls to
> > > mxc_add_gpio() into the respective callers. Having a global
> > > mxc_add_mxc_gpio() function that does something different for each
> > > caller seems entirely pointless to me.
> > >
> > Right now, mxc_add_mxc_gpio() is a postcore_initcall. Moving
> > individual mxc_add_gpio() call into irq_init function does not work.
> > And I need to find a proper caller for each SoC to call mxc_add_gpio
> > to register gpio devices.
>
> Why not init_machine? That is an arch_initcall(), so it's probably close
> enough.
>
The init_machine is mostly a board specific function than SoC specific
one. That is to say we will call mxc_add_gpio() in every single board
init function even for the same SoC.
--
Regards,
Shawn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists