[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110531153744.GB9048@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2011 00:37:44 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: blkdev_get() change causes OOPS...
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 10:35:07PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> I don't think whole->bd_disk is guaranteed to be non-NULL where you're
> dereferencing it in blkdev_get() after commit
> d4dc210f69bcb0b4bef5a83b1c323817be89bad1 ("block: don't block events
> on excl write for non-optical devices")
Ah... right, it's there if open succeeded. I should have put the test
after !res test. Does the following patch fix the problem?
Thanks.
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index 1f2b199..1a2421f 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1272,8 +1272,8 @@ int blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev, fmode_t mode, void *holder)
* individual writeable reference is too fragile given the
* way @mode is used in blkdev_get/put().
*/
- if ((disk->flags & GENHD_FL_BLOCK_EVENTS_ON_EXCL_WRITE) &&
- !res && (mode & FMODE_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder) {
+ if (!res && (mode & FMODE_WRITE) && !bdev->bd_write_holder &&
+ (disk->flags & GENHD_FL_BLOCK_EVENTS_ON_EXCL_WRITE)) {
bdev->bd_write_holder = true;
disk_block_events(disk);
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists