linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DE60A34.7070603@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:45:24 +0300
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

On 05/17/2011 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/11/2011 06:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> perf maintainers: please consider the first three patches for merging 
>> (the
>> first two make sense even without the rest).  If you're familiar with 
>> the Intel
>> PMU, please review patch 5 as well - it effectively undoes all your work
>> of abstracting the PMU into perf_events by unabstracting perf_events 
>> into what
>> is hoped is a very similar PMU.
>
> Perf maintainers, ping?
>

Re-ping?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/