linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 01 Jun 2011 12:26:32 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/5] KVM in-guest performance monitoring

On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:45 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 05/17/2011 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 05/11/2011 06:55 PM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> perf maintainers: please consider the first three patches for merging 
> >> (the
> >> first two make sense even without the rest).  If you're familiar with 
> >> the Intel
> >> PMU, please review patch 5 as well - it effectively undoes all your work
> >> of abstracting the PMU into perf_events by unabstracting perf_events 
> >> into what
> >> is hoped is a very similar PMU.
> >
> > Perf maintainers, ping?
> >
> 
> Re-ping?

Still struggling with merge window fallout, this is soon after that.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/