[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7vr57dfc8x.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:55:10 -0700
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ide: Fix bug caused by git merge
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> Junio - what made it harder for Steven to see the reason may be due
> the default history simplification. I do wonder if we should just make
> "--simplify-merges" the default, because the aggressive and simple
> default culling makes it hard to see merge commits like this that just
> pick one side over the other. --simplify-merges is more expensive,
> but doesn't have some of the problems the aggressive simplification
> has.
It is more expensive not just in computation cycles but in latency, as it
is inherently a "limited" operation that needs to first walk the history
and then post-process.
$ time sh -c 'git log drivers/ide/ide-cd.c | head -n 200 >/dev/null'
with and without "--simplify-merges" shows more than 50-fold differences
(0.15s vs 8s).
I am more disturbed by the fact that "git show 698567f3fa7" does not show
the mismerge (even with -c). Of course I know that not showing "taking
from one side" is by design of -c/--cc, but I still feel there should be
something we could do about it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists