[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307440414.2322.236.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:53:34 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: remove redundant check in select_task_rq_fair
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 15:18 +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> When balancing for wakeup affinity, a redundant check can removed.
Yes, tempting, but no, now you've got an extra call to wake_affine(),
which is more expensive.
> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A. Dadhania <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched_fair.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_fair.c b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> index 433491c..b9e5701 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
> @@ -1753,7 +1753,7 @@ select_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int sd_flag, int wake_flags)
> }
>
> if (affine_sd) {
> - if (cpu == prev_cpu || wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
> + if (wake_affine(affine_sd, p, sync))
> prev_cpu = cpu;
>
> new_cpu = select_idle_sibling(p, prev_cpu);
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists