[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110607100519.GF4133@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 12:05:19 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: pageexec@...email.hu
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@....edu>, x86@...nel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...ell.com>,
richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>,
Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
Louis Rilling <Louis.Rilling@...labs.com>,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86-64, vsyscalls: Rename UNSAFE_VSYSCALLS to
COMPAT_VSYSCALLS
* pageexec@...email.hu <pageexec@...email.hu> wrote:
> you called this feature "borderline security FUD" but have yet to
> prove it.
No, i did not claim that this feature is "borderline security FUD",
at all.
I said, and i quote my original reply to Linus:
|
| > Do you have *any* reason to call this "unsafe"?
|
| No, there's no reason at all for that. That naming is borderline
| security FUD and last time i saw the series i considered renaming
| it but got distracted :-)
|
https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/6/141
That the *NAMING* is borderline security FUD. (I already applied the
patches before i wrote that mail, see the commit notifications on
lkml.)
Either you have basic reading comprehension problems or you are
lying deliberately, putting words into my mouth that i never said.
Which one is it?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists