lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mxhugwu1.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:41:02 +0930
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	Christian Dietrich 
	<christian.dietrich@...ormatik.uni-erlangen.de>,
	"Venkatesh Pallipadi \(Venki\)" <venki@...gle.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
	Fengzhe Zhang <fengzhe.zhang@...el.com>,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	lguest@...ts.ozlabs.org, trivial@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] arch/x86: use printk_ratelimited instead of printk_ratelimit

On Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:11:53 +0200, richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 8:35 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote:
> > On Sat, 4 Jun 2011 17:37:04 +0200, Christian Dietrich <christian.dietrich@...ormatik.uni-erlangen.de> wrote:
> >> Since printk_ratelimit() shouldn't be used anymore (see comment in
> >> include/linux/printk.h), replace it with printk_ratelimited.
> >
> > Acked-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> (lguest part)
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> index db832fd..23a6eff 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/lguest/boot.c
> >> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@
> >>  #include <linux/lguest_launcher.h>
> >>  #include <linux/virtio_console.h>
> >>  #include <linux/pm.h>
> >> +#include <linux/ratelimit.h>
> >>  #include <asm/apic.h>
> >>  #include <asm/lguest.h>
> >>  #include <asm/paravirt.h>
> >
> > Is this new include really needed?  The printk_ratelimited() definition
> > is in printk.h...
> 
> Yes.
> printk_ratelimited() needs DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE() which is defined
> in ratelimit.h.

Yech.  I'm assuming that making printk.h include ratelimit.h makes a
nasty mess?

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ