linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] kprobes/trace: Fix kprobe selftest for gcc 4.6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1307470377.9218.3.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:12:57 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kprobes/trace: Fix kprobe selftest for gcc 4.6

On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 11:08 -0700, David Daney wrote:

> > -static int kprobe_trace_selftest_target(int a1, int a2, int a3,
> > -					int a4, int a5, int a6)
> > +/*
> > + * Can't be static, otherwise gcc might optimize this to
> > + * not be in the kallsyms table.
> > + */
> 
> Could you make it '__used' instead?
> 

I can try, but the problem is not that the function itself is being
optimized out. It looks like its being turned into anonymous text. That
is, it optimized out the symbol name, not the code itself.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/