[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF0DAAB.7010005@zytor.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 07:37:31 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjones@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: CONFIG_EFI should select CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
On 06/09/2011 07:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> EFI doesn't provide any guarantees that any given address will be free,
> so the bootloader must have the freedom to position the kernel
> appropriately. Make CONFIG_EFI select CONFIG_RELOCATABLE in order to
> ensure that this constraint is satisfiable.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index da34972..580cd31 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -1454,6 +1454,7 @@ config ARCH_USES_PG_UNCACHED
> config EFI
> bool "EFI runtime service support"
> depends on ACPI
> + select RELOCATABLE
> ---help---
> This enables the kernel to use EFI runtime services that are
> available (such as the EFI variable services).
Can we make this a depends on instead of select?
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists