[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF0DB8D.5080207@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2011 10:41:17 -0400
From: Peter Jones <pjones@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: CONFIG_EFI should select CONFIG_RELOCATABLE
On 06/09/2011 10:37 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 07:32 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> EFI doesn't provide any guarantees that any given address will be free,
>> so the bootloader must have the freedom to position the kernel
>> appropriately. Make CONFIG_EFI select CONFIG_RELOCATABLE in order to
>> ensure that this constraint is satisfiable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett<mjg@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/Kconfig | 1 +
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> index da34972..580cd31 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
>> @@ -1454,6 +1454,7 @@ config ARCH_USES_PG_UNCACHED
>> config EFI
>> bool "EFI runtime service support"
>> depends on ACPI
>> + select RELOCATABLE
>> ---help---
>> This enables the kernel to use EFI runtime services that are
>> available (such as the EFI variable services).
>
> Can we make this a depends on instead of select?
Seems weird to me - when you're configuring the kernel, you're more likely
to know that you want EFI than to remember that that requires relocation.
--
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists