[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimPT-LEsEs34dvPZNbVKnwCT8ck6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 17:51:50 +0800
From: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@...il.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ebiederm@...ssion.com
Subject: Re: + sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler-update.patch added to
-mm tree
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 1:19 AM, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 11:45 PM, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c~sysctl-add-proc_dointvec_unsigned-handler-update
>> +++ a/kernel/sysctl.c
>> @@ -2515,6 +2515,7 @@ int proc_dointvec_unsigned(struct ctl_ta
>> {
>> struct do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv_param param = {
>> .min = &zero,
>> + .max = (int *) table->extra2,
>> };
>> return do_proc_dointvec(table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos,
>> do_proc_dointvec_minmax_conv, ¶m);
>
> This is still buggybecause "zero" is only 1 variable and max can be an array.
> Sysctl boundary comparisons are done element-by-element.
Where's the array use case?
--
Regards
dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists