[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110611.160842.2135350880385482648.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 16:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: minipli@...glemail.com
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc, exec: remove redundant addr_limit assignment
From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:10:53 +0200
> The address limit is already set in flush_old_exec() so this
> assignment of USER_DS is redundant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
...
> @@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ void flush_thread(void)
>
> /* Clear FPU register state. */
> t->fpsaved[0] = 0;
> -
> - if (get_thread_current_ds() != ASI_AIUS)
> - set_fs(USER_DS);
> }
Yeah but now you're doing it unconditionally, the guard is here
because the %asi register write which set_fs() does is extremely
expensive on sparc64 and %99.99999 of the time we can avoid it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists