[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110611234415.GE11521@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 00:44:15 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: minipli@...glemail.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sparc, exec: remove redundant addr_limit assignment
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 04:08:42PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 15:10:53 +0200
>
> > The address limit is already set in flush_old_exec() so this
> > assignment of USER_DS is redundant.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@...glemail.com>
> ...
> > @@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ void flush_thread(void)
> >
> > /* Clear FPU register state. */
> > t->fpsaved[0] = 0;
> > -
> > - if (get_thread_current_ds() != ASI_AIUS)
> > - set_fs(USER_DS);
> > }
>
> Yeah but now you're doing it unconditionally, the guard is here
> because the %asi register write which set_fs() does is extremely
> expensive on sparc64 and %99.99999 of the time we can avoid it.
OTOH, get_thread_current_ds() is cheap and moving that into set_fs()
itself wouldn't be particulary bad idea...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists