[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTimz90oWNDYYNnpX5aDhJ192LhDkXA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 14:01:35 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Jonathan Elchison <JElchison@...il.com>
Cc: linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Huggins-Daines <dhd@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Patch for broken lsl64() "old code" with incorrect shift
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 05:50, Jonathan Elchison <JElchison@...il.com> wrote:
> In arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h, lsl64() doesn't calculate a
> correct HI_WORD(*dest) when count < 32, due to an incorrect shift
> operation. This line:
>
> HI_WORD(*dest) = (HI_WORD(*dest) << count) | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> count);
>
> ...should be...
>
> HI_WORD(*dest) = (HI_WORD(*dest) << count) | (LO_WORD(*dest) >>
> (32 - count));
>
> This function is ifdef'd out, marked as "old code". However, I fell
> into the same trap into which I suspect others have fallen (or will
> fall): On rare occasion when I need to implement my own library
> functions, I depend on the Linux kernel to provide solid code. This
> bug, albeit in old code, led me astray.
>
> I'm asking that this old code (lsl64) be corrected or removed.
I think it's better to just remove all #ifdefed out parts in the code.
> diff -up linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
> linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
> --- linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
> 22:50:32.538711320 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
> 22:47:43.407285452 -0400
> @@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline void lsl64(int count, unsi
> {
> if (count < 32) {
> HI_WORD(*dest) = (HI_WORD(*dest) << count)
> - | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> (32 - count));
> + | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> count);
> LO_WORD(*dest) <<= count;
> return;
> }
The patch is reversed?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists