[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTikk2v8m1wNYoTW6anRhJgy8AS9DfA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2011 08:34:18 -0400
From: Jonathan Elchison <JElchison@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, Jiri Kosina <trivial@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Huggins-Daines <dhd@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] m68k: Patch for broken lsl64() "old code" with incorrect shift
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 8:01 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> I think it's better to just remove all #ifdefed out parts in the code.
I'm good either way, as long as the broken "old code" is no longer present.
> The patch is reversed?
My apologies, you're correct. In case anyone is interested in the
correct patch:
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Elchison <jelchison@...il.com>
-----------------------------------------------------------------
diff -up linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h
--- linux-2.6_orig/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
22:47:43.407285452 -0400
+++ linux-2.6/arch/m68k/math-emu/multi_arith.h 2011-06-10
22:50:32.538711320 -0400
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ static inline void lsl64(int count, unsi
{
if (count < 32) {
HI_WORD(*dest) = (HI_WORD(*dest) << count)
- | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> count);
+ | (LO_WORD(*dest) >> (32 - count));
LO_WORD(*dest) <<= count;
return;
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please personally CC me on responses to this post.
v/r,
--
Jonathan Elchison
jelchison@...il.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists