[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1106131036430.1983-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 10:38:56 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Tanya Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
cc: balbi@...com, <greg@...ah.com>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <ablay@...eaurora.org>,
'open list' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'open list:FREESCALE USB PER...'" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"'open list:OMAP USB SUPPORT'" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] usb:gadget: use min_t() macro instead of min()
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011, Tanya Brokhman wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 02:14:46PM +0300, Tatyana Brokhman wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Tatyana Brokhman <tlinder@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > I need a sensible commit log for this. Why do we need to change all
> > min() to min_t() ?
> >
>
> Actually, Alan asked me to make this change in one place in dummy_hcd. I
> wasn't aware of the min_t macro before that. So when I searched the code for
> other places I found quite a few and just thought that it would be "nicer"
> to use min_t() instead of min() with casting.
> So we don't "need" to make this change. Everything works as is. This patch
> only makes the code look nicer, nothing more.
> I can elaborate the above in the commit log if you want.
The change I suggested involved replacing two typecasts with a single
min_t. All (or almost all) the places this patch touches currently
contain only one typecast, so the motivation for changing them is a lot
weaker.
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists