[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1308012193.9218.105.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 20:43:13 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, autofs@...ux.kernel.org,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Lockdep splat in autofs with 2.6.39-rc2
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 15:13 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2011-04-27 09:22 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > On 2011-04-21 17:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:44:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > > > Just saw this on 2.6.39-rc2 after half a day or so of uptime. I've
> > > > never seen it before today so it may be a regression from 2.6.38.
> > > > Nothing seems have failed as a result. Please let me know if you
> > > > need any more info.
> > >
> > > Could you try this patch. I know it may be hard to reproduce, but the
> > > issue is that we are recursing down the locks in a tree/list and we changed a
> > > lock from being nested to being a parent. This patch tells lockdep about
> > > what we did.
> >
> > OK, I've built 2.6.39-rc5 with this patch applied. However, it took ~5
> > days before I saw any splat with -rc4, thus it's unlikely that I'll be
> > able to say for sure that it works.
>
> FWIW, haven't had any problems with this kernel (+ patch) during the
> last two weeks.
I'm going to wrap this up and send it out as a proper patch. Can I add
your "Reported-by" and "Tested-by" tags?
Thanks,
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists