[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110511191301.GA18504@elliptictech.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 15:13:01 -0400
From: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, autofs@...ux.kernel.org,
Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Lockdep splat in autofs with 2.6.39-rc2
On 2011-04-27 09:22 -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> On 2011-04-21 17:25 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:44:03PM -0400, Nick Bowler wrote:
> > > Just saw this on 2.6.39-rc2 after half a day or so of uptime. I've
> > > never seen it before today so it may be a regression from 2.6.38.
> > > Nothing seems have failed as a result. Please let me know if you
> > > need any more info.
> >
> > Could you try this patch. I know it may be hard to reproduce, but the
> > issue is that we are recursing down the locks in a tree/list and we changed a
> > lock from being nested to being a parent. This patch tells lockdep about
> > what we did.
>
> OK, I've built 2.6.39-rc5 with this patch applied. However, it took ~5
> days before I saw any splat with -rc4, thus it's unlikely that I'll be
> able to say for sure that it works.
FWIW, haven't had any problems with this kernel (+ patch) during the
last two weeks.
Cheers,
--
Nick Bowler, Elliptic Technologies (http://www.elliptictech.com/)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists