linux-kernel - Re: [patch v4 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be called from the cpu online path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:08:24 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc:	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
	"trenn@...ell.com" <trenn@...ell.com>,
	"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
	"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@...el.com>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be
 called from the cpu online path


* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:56 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > 
> > >  include/linux/stop_machine.h |   11 +++--
> > >  kernel/stop_machine.c        |   91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > >  2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Btw., this is *way* too risky for a -stable backport.
> > 
> 
> Ingo, we can have a smaller patch (appended) for the -stable. How 
> do you want to go ahead? Take this small patch for both mainline 
> and -stable and the two code cleanup/consolidation patches for -tip 
> (to go into 3.1?). Thanks.

this:

>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mtrr/main.c |   15 ++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/stop_machine.h    |   17 +++++++++++++++++
>  kernel/stop_machine.c           |   15 +++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

looks pretty risky as well, this is core kernel code that is 
relatively rarely used and if it breaks it causes various high impact 
regressions.

Once Tejun is fine with the code we can do the larger patch upstream 
but not mark it for -stable backport. Once it's been upstream for a 
couple of weeks, once we are sure it does not regress, can we perhaps 
forward it to -stable ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/