[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110614080915.GD29900@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:09:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Cc: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"trenn@...ell.com" <trenn@...ell.com>,
"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@...el.com>,
"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch v4 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be
called from the cpu online path
* Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:49 -0700, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 12:56 -0700, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > > * Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > include/linux/stop_machine.h | 11 +++--
> > > > kernel/stop_machine.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > > > 2 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > Btw., this is *way* too risky for a -stable backport.
> > >
> >
> > Ingo, we can have a smaller patch (appended) for the -stable. How do you
> > want to go ahead? Take this small patch for both mainline and -stable
> > and the two code cleanup/consolidation patches for -tip (to go into
> > 3.1?). Thanks.
>
> oops. sent it too soon. fixed a !CONFIG_SMP compilation issue.
> Updated simple patch appended.
See? It's by definition not a "simple" patch.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists