[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF77ECB.4030709@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2011 17:31:23 +0200
From: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
CC: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jim Bos <jim876@...all.nl>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, efi: Do not reserve boot services regions within
reserved areas
Op 14-06-11 17:21, Matthew Garrett schreef:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:03:14PM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>
>> + /* Could not reserve boot area */
>> + if (!size)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Freeing boot area "
>> + "[0x%llx-0x%llx)\n", start, start+size);
> Probably don't need the printk - we could be dumping a few hundred of
> those.
Ok, I believe you are right about the succesful ones, since memblock=debug
will let you see those anyhow.
Should I change the unsuccesful ones to use memblock_dbg instead of printk?
In that case you can still debug it if needed. Same question for free path,
change printk to memblock_dbg?
>> - "Kernel-defined memdesc doesn't match the one from EFI!\n");
>> + "Kernel-defined memdesc (%lu) "
>> + "doesn't match the one from EFI(%lu)!\n",
>> + sizeof(efi_memory_desc_t), memmap.desc_size);
> And drop this hunk. It's entirely valid for an implementation to do
> this, we should just delete the message entirely.
Ok. Just wasn't sure what to make of it, since that message kept popping up here.
~Maarten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists