Message-ID: <20110614164804.GA613@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:48:04 -0700
From:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>,
	"Shi, Alex" <alex.shi@...el.com>
Subject: Re: rcu: performance regression

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 05:43:23AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:26:25PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > Commit a26ac2455ffcf3(rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread)
> > introduced performance regression. In our AIM7 test, this commit caused
> > about 40% regression.
> > The commit runs rcu callbacks in a kthread instead of softirq. We
> > observed high rate of context switch which is caused by this. Out test
> > system has 64 CPUs and HZ is 1000, so we saw more than 64k context
> > switch per second which is caused by the rcu thread.
> > I also did trace and found when rcy thread is woken up, most time the
> > thread doesn't handle any callbacks actually, it just initializes new gp
> > or end one gp or similar.
> > >From my understanding, the purpose to make rcu runs in kthread is to
> > speed up rcu callbacks run (with help of rtmutex PI), not for end gp and
> > so on, which runs pretty fast actually and doesn't need boost.
> > To verify my findings, I had below debug patch applied. It still handles
> > rcu callbacks in kthread if there is any pending callbacks, but other
> > things are still running in softirq. this completely solved our
> > regression. I thought this can still boost callbacks run. but I'm not
> > expert in the area, so please help.
> 
> Hello, Shaohua,
> 
> Could you please try the following patch?  In the meantime, I will
> also look over the patch that you sent.

OK, your patch looks quite good!  And I appear to have left off the
patch from my earlier email, which is just as well, as I don't think
it would help.  I am now testing your patch, and if it passes, I
will push it to Ingo for inclusion in 3.0.

I found the following issues with the patch, one of which I fixed
and the others of which are not critical:

o	rcu_check_callbacks() still calls invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(),
	which would only invoke callbacks, and would fail to advance the
	grace period.  I updated the commit so that rcu_check_callbacks()
	calls __invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread() instead, so please let me know
	if you see a problem with this.

o	At least one of my later commits need adjustment, which I will
	take care of.  Not a big deal.

o	The -rt patchset moves softirq processing to kthread context,
	so this patch will not help -rt run efficiently on 64-CPU
	systems.  But that is a problem for another day, even assuming
	that people do want to run -rt on 64-CPU systems.

o	This change invalidates some of my design for merging SRCU into
	TREE_PREEMPT_RCU, but that will be my problem to solve.  Probably
	won't be that hard to fix.  (Famous last words...)

o	Some other softirq could have lots of work, which would push
	processing to ksoftirqd, which cannot reasonably be priority
	boosted, which in turn could defeat RCU priority boosting.
	However, by keeping callback processing in kthread context, a
	major source of softirq work has been eliminated in comparison
	with 2.6.39.  So while I don't particularly like this, it seems
	a lot better than bottlenecking in the scheduler.

	Longer term, this problem will be fixed once threaded softirqs
	hit mainline.

o	I will fix the function naming for 3.1 to something like
	invoke_rcu_core() instead of __invoke_rcu_kthread().  However,
	this clearly is not a critical problem, and any attempt to fix
	the naming right now would increase both the size of the patch
	and the chances of error.

So if the attached patch still addresses the performance regressions
seen by Shaohua and Alex, I will push it.

							Thanx, Paul

PS.  I added your "Signed-off-by".  Please let me know if there is
     any problem with my doing that.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

rcu: Use softirq to address performance regression

Commit a26ac2455ffcf3(rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread)
introduced performance regression. In an AIM7 test, this commit degraded
performance by about 40%.

The commit runs rcu callbacks in a kthread instead of softirq. We observed
high rate of context switch which is caused by this. Out test system has
64 CPUs and HZ is 1000, so we saw more than 64k context switch per second
which is caused by RCU's per-CPU kthread.  A trace showed that most of
the time the RCU per-CPU kthread doesn't actually handle any callbacks,
but instead just does a very small amount of work handling grace periods.
This means that RCU's per-CPU kthreads are making the scheduler do quite
a bit of work in order to allow a very small amount of RCU-related
processing to be done.

Alex Shi's analysis determined that this slowdown is due to lock
contention within the scheduler.  Unfortunately, the scheduler's real-time
semantics require global action, which means that this contention is
inherent in real-time scheduling.  (Yes, perhaps someone will come up
with a workaround -- otherwise, -rt is not going to do well on large SMP
systems -- but this patch will work around this issue in the meantime.
And "the meantime" might well be forever.)

This patch therefore re-introduces softirq processing to RCU, but only
for core RCU work.  RCU callbacks are still executed in kthread context,
so that only a small amount of RCU work runs in softirq context in the
common case.  This should minimize ksoftirqd execution, allowing us to
skip boosting of ksoftirqd for CONFIG_RCU_BOOST=y kernels.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
index f481780..db3b1ab 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt
@@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ Provides counts of softirq handlers serviced since boot time, for each cpu.
  TASKLET:          0          0          0        290
    SCHED:      27035      26983      26971      26746
  HRTIMER:          0          0          0          0
+     RCU:       1678       1769       2178       2250
 
 
 1.3 IDE devices in /proc/ide
diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h
index 6c12989..f6efed0 100644
--- a/include/linux/interrupt.h
+++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h
@@ -414,6 +414,7 @@ enum
 	TASKLET_SOFTIRQ,
 	SCHED_SOFTIRQ,
 	HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ,
+	RCU_SOFTIRQ,    /* Preferable RCU should always be the last softirq */
 
 	NR_SOFTIRQS
 };
diff --git a/include/trace/events/irq.h b/include/trace/events/irq.h
index ae045ca..1c09820 100644
--- a/include/trace/events/irq.h
+++ b/include/trace/events/irq.h
@@ -20,7 +20,8 @@ struct softirq_action;
 			 softirq_name(BLOCK_IOPOLL),	\
 			 softirq_name(TASKLET),		\
 			 softirq_name(SCHED),		\
-			 softirq_name(HRTIMER))
+			 softirq_name(HRTIMER),		\
+			 softirq_name(RCU))
 
 /**
  * irq_handler_entry - called immediately before the irq action handler
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.c b/kernel/rcutree.c
index 5d6b845..ed9dadd 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
@@ -100,6 +100,7 @@ static char rcu_kthreads_spawnable;
 
 static void rcu_node_kthread_setaffinity(struct rcu_node *rnp, int outgoingcpu);
 static void invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void);
+static void __invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void);
 
 #define RCU_KTHREAD_PRIO 1	/* RT priority for per-CPU kthreads. */
 
@@ -1330,7 +1331,7 @@ void rcu_check_callbacks(int cpu, int user)
 	}
 	rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(cpu);
 	if (rcu_pending(cpu))
-		invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread();
+		__invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread();
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
@@ -1495,13 +1496,21 @@ __rcu_process_callbacks(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
 	}
 
 	/* If there are callbacks ready, invoke them. */
-	rcu_do_batch(rsp, rdp);
+	if (cpu_has_callbacks_ready_to_invoke(rdp))
+		__invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread();
+}
+
+static void rcu_kthread_do_work(void)
+{
+	rcu_do_batch(&rcu_sched_state, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_sched_data));
+	rcu_do_batch(&rcu_bh_state, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_bh_data));
+	rcu_preempt_do_callbacks();
 }
 
 /*
  * Do softirq processing for the current CPU.
  */
-static void rcu_process_callbacks(void)
+static void rcu_process_callbacks(struct softirq_action *unused)
 {
 	__rcu_process_callbacks(&rcu_sched_state,
 				&__get_cpu_var(rcu_sched_data));
@@ -1518,7 +1527,7 @@ static void rcu_process_callbacks(void)
  * the current CPU with interrupts disabled, the rcu_cpu_kthread_task
  * cannot disappear out from under us.
  */
-static void invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void)
+static void __invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 
@@ -1530,6 +1539,11 @@ static void invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void)
 	local_irq_restore(flags);
 }
 
+static void invoke_rcu_cpu_kthread(void)
+{
+	raise_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ);
+}
+
 /*
  * Wake up the specified per-rcu_node-structure kthread.
  * Because the per-rcu_node kthreads are immortal, we don't need
@@ -1664,7 +1678,7 @@ static int rcu_cpu_kthread(void *arg)
 		*workp = 0;
 		local_irq_restore(flags);
 		if (work)
-			rcu_process_callbacks();
+			rcu_kthread_do_work();
 		local_bh_enable();
 		if (*workp != 0)
 			spincnt++;
@@ -2423,6 +2437,7 @@ void __init rcu_init(void)
 	rcu_init_one(&rcu_sched_state, &rcu_sched_data);
 	rcu_init_one(&rcu_bh_state, &rcu_bh_data);
 	__rcu_init_preempt();
+	 open_softirq(RCU_SOFTIRQ, rcu_process_callbacks);
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't need protection against CPU-hotplug here because
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree.h b/kernel/rcutree.h
index 4238f63..eb57b94 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@ -443,6 +443,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_offline_cpu(int cpu);
 #endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU */
 static void rcu_preempt_check_callbacks(int cpu);
 static void rcu_preempt_process_callbacks(void);
+static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void);
 void call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (*func)(struct rcu_head *rcu));
 #if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_TREE_PREEMPT_RCU)
 static void rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp);
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 37caa15..b1cdc21 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -602,6 +602,11 @@ static void rcu_preempt_process_callbacks(void)
 				&__get_cpu_var(rcu_preempt_data));
 }
 
+static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void)
+{
+	rcu_do_batch(&rcu_preempt_state, &__get_cpu_var(rcu_preempt_data));
+}
+
 /*
  * Queue a preemptible-RCU callback for invocation after a grace period.
  */
@@ -988,6 +993,10 @@ static void rcu_preempt_process_callbacks(void)
 {
 }
 
+static void rcu_preempt_do_callbacks(void)
+{
+}
+
 /*
  * Wait for an rcu-preempt grace period, but make it happen quickly.
  * But because preemptible RCU does not exist, map to rcu-sched.
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 1396017..40cf63d 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, ksoftirqd);
 
 char *softirq_to_name[NR_SOFTIRQS] = {
 	"HI", "TIMER", "NET_TX", "NET_RX", "BLOCK", "BLOCK_IOPOLL",
-	"TASKLET", "SCHED", "HRTIMER"
+	"TASKLET", "SCHED", "HRTIMER", "RCU"
 };
 
 /*
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
index 1e88485..0a7ed5b 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/trace-event-parse.c
@@ -2187,6 +2187,7 @@ static const struct flag flags[] = {
 	{ "TASKLET_SOFTIRQ", 6 },
 	{ "SCHED_SOFTIRQ", 7 },
 	{ "HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ", 8 },
+	{ "RCU_SOFTIRQ", 9 },
 
 	{ "HRTIMER_NORESTART", 0 },
 	{ "HRTIMER_RESTART", 1 },
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists