linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20110615085617.949d418f.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:56:17 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree

Hi Dave,

On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:56:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> failed like this:
> 
> [See summary in patch below.]
> 
> [Hmmm, suddenly allmodconfig is building stuff in staging?  Ah ha!
> Commit fe35a59e16fb ("Staging: remove STAGING_EXCLUDE_BUILD
> option")  Greg, a bit of warning might have been nice :-( ]
> 
> I assume that this is fallout from commit a6b7a407865a ("net: remove
> interrupt.h inclusion from netdevice.h").
> 
> I added the following patch for today:
> 
> From 520e46c255afa851b33e5c4a2bcf2112ecccbb6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:19:09 +1000
> Subject: [PATCH] net/staging: add needed interrupt.h and hardirq.h includes

I am still getting these build errors and applying the patch.  I would
assume that if you merge Linus' tree (-rc3 will do it) into net-next, you
will get these failures as well (for an x86_64 allmodconfig build at
least).

I think that this patch would probably apply to just the net-next tree
anyway.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped