[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20110620145807.9c202509.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:58:07 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the net tree
Hi Dave,
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:56:17 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:56:57 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > After merging the net tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig)
> > failed like this:
> >
> > [See summary in patch below.]
> >
> > I assume that this is fallout from commit a6b7a407865a ("net: remove
> > interrupt.h inclusion from netdevice.h").
> >
> > I added the following patch for today:
> >
> > From 520e46c255afa851b33e5c4a2bcf2112ecccbb6f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:19:09 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] net/staging: add needed interrupt.h and hardirq.h includes
>
> I am still getting these build errors and applying the patch. I would
> assume that if you merge Linus' tree (-rc3 will do it) into net-next, you
> will get these failures as well (for an x86_64 allmodconfig build at
> least).
>
> I think that this patch would probably apply to just the net-next tree
> anyway.
Ping.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists