[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4DF8D788.4050105@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:02:16 +0200
From: Maarten Lankhorst <m.b.lankhorst@...il.com>
To: Hugo Mills <hugo@...fax.org.uk>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] btrfs: Remove all sysfs entries
Op 15-06-11 12:34, Hugo Mills schreef:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:40:31AM +0200, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
>> Seems that currently none of the sysfs are created any more, so just
>> remove sysfs support entirely.
>>
>> Fixes compiling warnings in 3.0rc3
> I would actually like to retain sysfs support -- the current
> entries may not be used (or useful, or in the right place, or even
> visible these days), but there's plenty of things that could and
> should go in sysfs from btrfs.
>
> So, please do remove the unwanted/unused file entries, but could
> you leave the sysfs file itself, and the (limited) bits that create
> the btrfs subdir? Otherwise, I'm going to be putting it all back in
> this weekend when I get the time to revisit Goffredo's old sysfs
> patch...
Currently sysfs.c is just 2 function calls, rest is unused, so I'll wait then.
Will in_sysfs in struct btrfs_root be used again? Currently it's not
used but only assigned zero.
~Maarten
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists