[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110615222608.GA14031@dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 18:26:08 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
davej@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, x86@...nel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
andre.przywara@....com, Mark.Langsdorf@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [CPUFREQ] powernow-k8: Don't notify of successful
transition if we failed.
> > @@ -1112,6 +1114,9 @@ static int transition_frequency_pstate(struct powernow_k8_data *data,
> > }
> >
> > res = transition_pstate(data, pstate);
> > + if (res)
> > + return res;
>
> That's wrong because transition_pstate() returns 0 unconditionally
> (at least it does so on 3.0-rc3). But this change accidentally fixes
> a different bug because res is used uninitialized, containing stack
> garbage otherwise.
>
> A proper fix should be to check against data->max_hw_pstate and
> check whether the entry is not CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID (look at
> fill_powernow_table_pstate() for example).
Aha! I can respin a patch for that tomorrow.
>
> I'm guessing this oops happens when powernow-k8 is loaded in the guest
> and that the actual power management is done in the hypervisor?
Yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists