linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] power: opp: Fix rcu_dereference

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DF84F31.4030108@ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jun 2011 11:50:33 +0530
From:	Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>
To:	"Menon, Nishanth" <nm@...com>
CC:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...prootsystems.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power: opp: Fix rcu_dereference_check() without protection!

On 6/14/2011 9:08 PM, Menon, Nishanth wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 08:03, Santosh Shilimkar
> <santosh.shilimkar@...com>  wrote:
>> With RCU debug options enabled, below warning is observed.
>>
>> ===================================================
>> [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> drivers/base/power/opp.c:151 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
>>
>> other info that might help us debug this:
>>
>> rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 1
>> no locks held by swapper/1.
>> ...
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Fix the same by protecting it with rcu_read lock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar<santosh.shilimkar@...com>
>> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki<rjw@...k.pl>
>> Cc: Nishanth Menon<nm@...com>
>> Cc: Kevin Hilman<khilman@...prootsystems.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/base/power/opp.c |    2 ++
>>   1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>> index 56a6899..cbed5e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
>> @@ -148,7 +148,9 @@ unsigned long opp_get_voltage(struct opp *opp)
>>         struct opp *tmp_opp;
>>         unsigned long v = 0;
>>
>> +       rcu_read_lock();
>>         tmp_opp = rcu_dereference(opp);
>> +       rcu_read_unlock();
>>         if (unlikely(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(tmp_opp)) || !tmp_opp->available)
>>                 pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
>>         else
> NAK. please read the Documentation/power/opp.txt
> the usage is as follows:
> rcu_read_lock();
> opp = opp_find_freq_ceil();
> voltage = opp_get_voltage(opp);
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> the reason for this is that the opp pointer is not safe if we lock
> just the dereferencing.
>
Fair enough. if the whole fn is under the lock then it's not
necessary.

Regards
Santosh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/