[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110616094737.GB5583@const.bordeaux.inria.fr>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:47:37 +0200
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition
Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 11:44:30 +0200, a écrit :
> The output of hwloc-gather-topology is :
>
> Machine (phys=0 local=280840KB total=280840KB)
> Socket #0 (phys=3)
> Core #0 (phys=0)
> PU #0 (phys=0)
> Core #1 (phys=1)
> PU #1 (phys=1)
> depth 0: 1 Machine (type #1)
> depth 1: 1 Socket (type #3)
> depth 2: 2 Cores (type #5)
> depth 3: 2 PUs (type #6)
> Topology not from this system
>
> let me know if it's what you want
This looks good for a bicore socket, yes. Could you send me the tarball
it created, so we can include it in the hwloc testsuite?
Do you have a example with smt cores?
Samuel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists