[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTin2F-sJNjrMhTTqrh0J3ej9OVvQxA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 11:56:03 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org
Cc: Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add Arm cpu topology definition
On 16 June 2011 11:47, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org> wrote:
> Vincent Guittot, le Thu 16 Jun 2011 11:44:30 +0200, a écrit :
>> The output of hwloc-gather-topology is :
>>
>> Machine (phys=0 local=280840KB total=280840KB)
>> Socket #0 (phys=3)
>> Core #0 (phys=0)
>> PU #0 (phys=0)
>> Core #1 (phys=1)
>> PU #1 (phys=1)
>> depth 0: 1 Machine (type #1)
>> depth 1: 1 Socket (type #3)
>> depth 2: 2 Cores (type #5)
>> depth 3: 2 PUs (type #6)
>> Topology not from this system
>>
>> let me know if it's what you want
>
> This looks good for a bicore socket, yes. Could you send me the tarball
> it created, so we can include it in the hwloc testsuite?
>
yes, I will send it to you
> Do you have a example with smt cores?
no, I haven't
>
> Samuel
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists