[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110617105443.GP12230@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 13:54:44 +0300
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grant@...retlab.ca,
ralf@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] FRV: Hook up gpiolib support
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:50:59AM +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
>
> > And to repeat what I said: the generic header prototypes everything it
> > needs before it uses it so there should be no problem here, it's not
> > been a problem on the other architectures using this code verbatim.
> > Please be more specific.
>
> Okay:
>
> CC drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.o
> In file included from /data/frv/linux-2.6-frv/arch/frv/include/asm/gpio.h:21,
> from include/linux/gpio.h:8,
> from drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:17:
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h: In function 'gpio_get_value_cansleep':
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h:233: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_get_value'
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h: In function 'gpio_set_value_cansleep':
> include/asm-generic/gpio.h:239: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_set_value'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c: In function 'gpio_flash_probe':
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:234: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_request'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:238: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_free'
> drivers/mtd/maps/gpio-addr-flash.c:242: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_direction_output'
>
>
> Let me expand on my explanation earlier:
>
> (1) asm-generic/gpio.h has an _inline_ function:
>
> static inline int gpio_get_value_cansleep(unsigned gpio)
> {
> might_sleep();
> return gpio_get_value(gpio);
> }
>
> (2) gpio_get_value() is implemented in asm/gpio.h. It is not declared in
> asm-generic/gpio.h.
>
> (3) Therefore, the #inclusion of asm-generic/gpio.h must come _after_ the
> implementation of gpio_get_value() in asm/gpio.h.
>
> (4) asm/gpio.h implements the aforementioned inline function:
>
> static inline int gpio_get_value(unsigned int gpio)
> {
> return __gpio_get_value(gpio);
> }
>
> (5) __gpio_get_value() is declared in asm-generic/gpio.h. It is not declared
> in asm/gpio.h.
>
> (6) Therefore, the #inclusion of asm/gpio.h must come _before_ the
> implementation of gpio_get_value() in asm/gpio.h.
>
> Thus (3) and (6) contradict.
sounds like it's time to move all that mess to one header alone ?!?
<linux/gpio.h> should be self-sufficient ?
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists