linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] platform: fix samsung brightness min/max calculations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201106200736.29259.jasonbstubbs@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 20 Jun 2011 07:36:29 +1000
From:	Jason Stubbs <jasonbstubbs@...il.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform: fix samsung brightness min/max calculations

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 09:55:49 Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 08:44:25PM +1000, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > As far as I can tell, the patches aren't applied to any trees yet and are
> > just sitting in .../gregkh/patches.git. If that's the case, what I would
> > like is for fix-samsung-brightness-min-max-calculations.patch to be
> > replaced with the version in https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/4/20/1 and I
> > resubmit a fixed (and enhanced)
> > add-support-for-samsung-nc210-nc110.patch that applies on top of it.
> > That way an enhancement patch won't hold up a bugfix patch should there
> > be any further issues.
> 
> Ok, I'll drop this one, but can you resend the above referenced patch so
> I can apply it?

Somehow I managed to screw things up again as the nc210-nc110 patch isn't
against the min-max-calculations patch... Doesn't matter though. The patch I
just resent applies on top of the nc210-nc110 patch that you already have in
patches.git.

> Sorry for the delay in working on this, my access to a samsung laptop is
> now gone, and I've been swamped with other stuff.

No problem.

> Any chance you want to take over maintaining this driver now yourself?
> You seem to have a much better understanding of it in places than I do
> at the moment, combined with a strong need to keep it working properly

I'm not exactly sure what that entails, but I don't have access to any specs
and have never dealt with any hardware programming before. Even these patches
don't directly deal with the hardware so I'm not sure that I'm best suited to
being the maintainer. Having said that, I'm happy to try my hand at any bugs
that arise and review any patches..

Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/