[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110621162427.GA28836@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:24:27 -0700
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>, stable@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH v2] msm: timer: compensate for timer shift in
msm_read_timer_count
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:27:16PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20 2011, Greg KH wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 01:55:38PM -0700, Jeff Ohlstein wrote:
> >> Some msm targets have timers whose lower bits are unreliable. So, we
> >> present our timers as lower frequency than they actually are, and ignore
> >> the bottom 5 bits on such targets. This compensation was erroneously
> >> removed from the msm_read_timer_count function, so restore it.
> >>
> >> This was broken by 94790ec25 "msm: timer: SMP timer support for msm".
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>
> >> ---
> >> arch/arm/mach-msm/timer.c | 6 +++++-
> >> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >>
> >
> > <formletter>
> >
> > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
> > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt
> > for how to do this properly.
> >
> > </formletter>
>
> I don't think this patch was intended for stable in the first place.
> Jeff, this is a fix for 3.0-rcx, right?
Then why was it sent to stable@...nel.org?
confused,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists