linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [PATCH v2] msm: timer: compensate for timer shift in msm_read_timer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E1362DD.7030001@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Tue, 05 Jul 2011 12:15:41 -0700
From:	Jeff Ohlstein <johlstei@...eaurora.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>, stable@...nel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH v2] msm: timer: compensate for timer shift in
 msm_read_timer_count

Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 04:27:16PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
>> I don't think this patch was intended for stable in the first place.
>> Jeff, this is a fix for 3.0-rcx, right?
> 
> Then why was it sent to stable@...nel.org?
> 
> confused,
> 
> greg k-h
> 

Sorry, this was indeed intended for stable. I will include the Cc: tag
in future patches stable. However, since this was already picked up in
Linus's tree, how should I proceed to get it into stable?

Jeff

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/