linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4E00FF58.7070802@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:30:16 -0500
From:	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
CC:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	wayneb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, mbizon@...ebox.fr, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported

Looks good to me. Jeff/Tejun - any issues with merging this?

Thanks,

Brian

On 06/21/2011 11:07 AM, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Ping on this -- Tejun, Brian, Jeff, this is a pretty annoying 2.6.39
> regression which it would be good to have fixed in 3.0.
> 
> Thanks,
> Nish
> 
> On 16.06.2011 [08:28:36 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>> On 16.06.2011 [08:28:39 -0500], Brian King wrote:
>>> On 06/16/2011 02:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:17PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
>>>>>> That looks like the right thing to do. For ipr's usage of
>>>>>> libata, we don't have the concept of a port frozen state, so this flag
>>>>>> should really never get set. The alternate way to fix this would be to
>>>>>> only set ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN in ata_port_alloc if ap->ops->error_handler
>>>>>> is not NULL.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seemed like ipr is as you say, but I wasn't sure if it was
>>>>> appropriate to make the change above in the common libata-scis code or
>>>>> not. I don't want to break some other device on accident.
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, I tried your suggestion, but I don't think that can happen in
>>>>> ata_port_alloc? ata_port_alloc is allocated ap itself, and it seems like
>>>>> ap->ops typically gets set only after ata_port_alloc returns?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe we can test error_handler in ata_sas_port_start()?
>>>
>>> Good point. Since libsas is converted to the new eh now, we would need to have
>>> this test.
>>
>> Commit 7b3a24c57d2eeda8dba9c205342b12689c4679f9 ("ahci: don't enable
>> port irq before handler is registered") caused a regression for CD-ROMs
>> attached to the IPR SATA bus on Power machines:
>>
>>   ata_port_alloc: ENTER
>>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe begin
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA7:PIO5
>>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>>   ata1.00: disabled
>>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe end
>>   scsi_alloc_sdev: Allocation failure during SCSI scanning, some SCSI devices might not be configured
>>
>> The FROZEN flag added in that commit is only cleared by the new EH code,
>> which is not used by ipr. Clear this flag in the SAS code if we don't
>> support new EH.
>>
>> Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> index d51f979..ebe1685 100644
>> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
>> @@ -3797,6 +3797,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_alloc);
>>   */
>>  int ata_sas_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
>>  {
>> +	/*
>> +	 * the port is marked as frozen at allocation time, but if we don't
>> +	 * have new eh, we won't thaw it
>> +	 */
>> +	if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
>> +		ap->pflags &= ~ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_start);
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
>> IBM Linux Technology Center
> 


-- 
Brian King
Linux on Power Virtualization
IBM Linux Technology Center


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/