linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20110621160714.GA14174@us.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2011 09:07:14 -0700
From:	Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
To:	Brian King <brking@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	wayneb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, mbizon@...ebox.fr, jgarzik@...ox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] libata/sas: only set FROZEN flag if new EH is supported

Ping on this -- Tejun, Brian, Jeff, this is a pretty annoying 2.6.39
regression which it would be good to have fixed in 3.0.

Thanks,
Nish

On 16.06.2011 [08:28:36 -0700], Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> On 16.06.2011 [08:28:39 -0500], Brian King wrote:
> > On 06/16/2011 02:51 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 04:34:17PM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> > >>> That looks like the right thing to do. For ipr's usage of
> > >>> libata, we don't have the concept of a port frozen state, so this flag
> > >>> should really never get set. The alternate way to fix this would be to
> > >>> only set ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN in ata_port_alloc if ap->ops->error_handler
> > >>> is not NULL.
> > >>
> > >> It seemed like ipr is as you say, but I wasn't sure if it was
> > >> appropriate to make the change above in the common libata-scis code or
> > >> not. I don't want to break some other device on accident.
> > >>
> > >> Also, I tried your suggestion, but I don't think that can happen in
> > >> ata_port_alloc? ata_port_alloc is allocated ap itself, and it seems like
> > >> ap->ops typically gets set only after ata_port_alloc returns?
> > > 
> > > Maybe we can test error_handler in ata_sas_port_start()?
> > 
> > Good point. Since libsas is converted to the new eh now, we would need to have
> > this test.
> 
> Commit 7b3a24c57d2eeda8dba9c205342b12689c4679f9 ("ahci: don't enable
> port irq before handler is registered") caused a regression for CD-ROMs
> attached to the IPR SATA bus on Power machines:
> 
>   ata_port_alloc: ENTER
>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe begin
>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>   ata1.00: limiting speed to UDMA7:PIO5
>   ata1.00: ata_dev_read_id: ENTER
>   ata1.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x40)
>   ata1.00: disabled
>   ata_port_probe: ata1: bus probe end
>   scsi_alloc_sdev: Allocation failure during SCSI scanning, some SCSI devices might not be configured
> 
> The FROZEN flag added in that commit is only cleared by the new EH code,
> which is not used by ipr. Clear this flag in the SAS code if we don't
> support new EH.
> 
> Reported-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
> Signed-off-by: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> index d51f979..ebe1685 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c
> @@ -3797,6 +3797,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_alloc);
>   */
>  int ata_sas_port_start(struct ata_port *ap)
>  {
> +	/*
> +	 * the port is marked as frozen at allocation time, but if we don't
> +	 * have new eh, we won't thaw it
> +	 */
> +	if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
> +		ap->pflags &= ~ATA_PFLAG_FROZEN;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ata_sas_port_start);
> 
> 
> -- 
> Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
> IBM Linux Technology Center

-- 
Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/