[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BANLkTinmahnoJ2Rip2jzP=tt6wrhRQN3sA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 16:58:50 -0600
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: patches@...aro.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Jason Liu <jason.hui@...aro.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Mitch Bradley <wmb@...mworks.com>,
Jeremy Kerr <jeremy.kerr@...onical.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial/imx: add device tree support
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 4:52 PM, Segher Boessenkool
<segher@...nel.crashing.org> wrote:
>> Ah, we're having an impedance mismatch. I'm thinking specifically
>> about the device tree compiler and some syntactic sugar for using the
>> label definition to generate /also/ create alias properties. The
>> hairiness is related to that and the way that dtc is implemented, not
>> with the final aliases themselves.
>
> You can generate DTC-style aliases from OFW-style aliases instead (or
> as well), it has other advantages (like being more readable, and having
> the aliases grouped together).
There is no difference between OFW and DTC aliases as far as I'm aware.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists