[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110623092401.GI30101@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:24:01 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] ptrace: kill detah tracehooks
Hey, Oleg.
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 09:39:29PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > - signal = tracehook_notify_death(tsk, &cookie, group_dead);
> > - if (signal >= 0)
> > - signal = do_notify_parent(tsk, signal);
> > + /*
> > + * Notify interested parent if the whole group is dead. Ptracer
> > + * should always be notified. If something other than our normal
> > + * parent is ptracing us, then send it a SIGCHLD instead of
> > + * honoring exit_signal. exit_signal only has special meaning to
> > + * our real parent.
> > + */
> > + if (!task_detached(tsk) && thread_group_empty(tsk)) {
> > + if (!ptrace_reparented(tsk))
> > + do_notify_parent(tsk, tsk->exit_signal);
> > + else
> > + do_notify_parent(tsk, SIGCHLD);
>
> Forget about ptrace, suppose a single threaded child exits and its
> parent ignores SIGCHLD. In this case do_notify_parent() sets
> exit_signal = -1 to mark it dead, we should set exit_state = EXIT_DEAD
> and release it.
Oops, right. Missed do_notify_parent() may modify exit_signal.
Grumble. It seems you already have posted patches to address this
one. Let's continue there.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists