[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110623095239.GK30101@htj.dyndns.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:52:39 +0200
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
hch@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] make do_notify_parent() return bool
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:08:18PM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> - change do_notify_parent() to return a boolean, true if the task should
> be reaped because its parent ignores SIGCHLD.
>
> - update the only caller which checks the returned value, exit_notify().
>
> This temporary uglifies exit_notify() even more, will be cleanuped by
> the next change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> @@ -2161,7 +2161,7 @@ extern int kill_pid_info_as_uid(int, str
> extern int kill_pgrp(struct pid *pid, int sig, int priv);
> extern int kill_pid(struct pid *pid, int sig, int priv);
> extern int kill_proc_info(int, struct siginfo *, pid_t);
> -extern int do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *, int);
> +extern bool do_notify_parent(struct task_struct *, int);
> extern void __wake_up_parent(struct task_struct *p, struct task_struct *parent);
> extern void force_sig(int, struct task_struct *);
> extern int send_sig(int, struct task_struct *, int);
While at it, would you mind adding the name of the parameters to the
prototype? I find prototypes w/o parameter names a bit irksome.
Other than that,
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists