[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <017301cc314c$37839eb0$a68adc10$@com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 11:21:10 +0900
From: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>
To: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: sameo@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] mfd: Add I2C control support for S5M8751
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 10:29 AM +0900, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Thank for your comment,
> > We have a few PMIC (S5M8751, S5M8752 and others).
> > They have different features. And Each one will have separate core file.
> > But i2c interface is same.
> > So, I try to separate i2s code.
> > I would modify prefix like s5m87xx.
>
> In that case you should definitely take a look at the regmap API I've
> been posting. It factors all the device I/O stuff out so you should be
> able to just tell it that you have a device with n bit registers and n
> bit values and it'll provide all the I/O functions you need. I just
> reposted it today, though it needs another round for some SPI stuff.
OK, After reviewing your patch, I will apply it.
> > > > +static int s5m8751_i2c_read_device(struct s5m8751 *s5m8751, uint8_t
> > reg,
> > > > + uint8_t *val)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret;
> > > > + ret = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(s5m8751->i2c_client, reg);
> > > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > > + dev_err(s5m8751->dev, "failed reading at 0x%02x\n",
> reg);
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > + }
> > > > + *val = (uint8_t)ret;
>
> > > Why is this case required?
>
> > I want pass the read value by val
>
> Sorry, typo - why is this *cast* required?
Just want to make same type.
Thanks,
SB Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists