[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E047EE6.2030505@windriver.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 08:11:18 -0400
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
CC: "J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>, <stable@...nel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <stable-review@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [34-longterm 100/247] NFS: fix the return value of nfs_file_fsync()
On 11-06-23 10:05 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 11:03 +0900, J. R. Okajima wrote:
>> Paul Gortmaker:
>>> By the commit af7fa16 2010-08-03 NFS: Fix up the fsync code
>>> close(2) became returning the non-zero value even if it went well.
>>> nfs_file_fsync() should return 0 when "status" is positive.
>>>
>>> [PG: in 34, nfs_file_fsync is just a wrapper around nfs_do_fsync,
>>> so the related code and actual change lands in nfs_do_fsync here.]
>>
>> In these 247 patches, I could not find the backport of
>> af7fa16 2010-08-03 NFS: Fix up the fsync code
>> If you bring the commit af7fa16 into 2.6.34.10, then you will need this
>> one (0702099bd in upstream) too. Otherwise I am afraid it is
>> unnecessary.
>> But I'd ask a reply from Trond Myklebust.
>
> I agree.
Thanks guys! I'll queue 0702099bd86c33c2dcdbd3963433a61f3f503901
for 34.10
Paul.
>
> Cheers
> Trond
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists