linux-kernel - RE: [lm-sensors] coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU (TunnelCreek)?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <D6D887BA8C9DFF48B5233887EF04654109E84A62C0@bgsmsx502.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jun 2011 22:10:44 +0530
From:	"R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
To:	"guenter.roeck@...csson.com" <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
CC:	"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
	"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Subject: RE: [lm-sensors] coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU
	(TunnelCreek)?

Hi Guenter,

> I thought about replacing the manual TjMax detection code with code
> using the model string to take care of problems like this - essentially
> by providing a table with entries { model string, Tjmax } for each CPU
> with Tjmax other than 100 degrees C. This way we could get rid of some
> of the odd code we have today. Would that make sense ?

I completely agree with you here.
This way, a lot of code in get_tjmax will be reduced, by just
a search through some array.
 
Thanks,
Durga

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/