[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309193405.8271.645.camel@groeck-laptop>
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 09:50:05 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
To: "R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@...tec-electronic.com>
Subject: RE: [lm-sensors] coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU
(TunnelCreek)?
On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 12:40 -0400, R, Durgadoss wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> > I thought about replacing the manual TjMax detection code with code
> > using the model string to take care of problems like this - essentially
> > by providing a table with entries { model string, Tjmax } for each CPU
> > with Tjmax other than 100 degrees C. This way we could get rid of some
> > of the odd code we have today. Would that make sense ?
>
> I completely agree with you here.
> This way, a lot of code in get_tjmax will be reduced, by just
> a search through some array.
>
Unfortunately, looking at Alexander's /proc/cpuinfo output, it looks
like the E6xx chips have no mention of E6xx in the CPU ID string, which
unfortunately kills the idea.
Do you know if there is _any_ means to distinguish E6xx from E6xxT ?
Thanks,
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists