[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E0AEF29.7080706@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:23:53 +0300
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...fujitsu.com>
CC: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/22] KVM: optimize for MMIO handled
On 06/22/2011 05:27 PM, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> In this version, we fix the bugs in the v1:
> - fix broken read emulation spans a page boundary
> - fix invalid spte point is got if we walk shadow page table
> out of the mmu lock
>
> And, we also introduce some rules to modify spte in this version,
> then it does not need to atomically clear/set spte on x86_32 host
> anymore, the performance report of x86_32 host is in the later section
>
> Avi,
>
> I have sampled the operation of lockless shadow page walking as below steps:
> - mark walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte as 'noinline'
> - do the netperf test, the client is on the guest(NIC is e1000) and the server
> is on the host, it can generate large press of mmio access
> - using perf to sample it, and the result of 'perf report' is attached
>
> The ratio of walk_shadow_page_get_mmio_spte is 0.09%, the ratio of handle_ept_misconfig
> is 0.11%, the ratio of handle_mmio_page_fault_common is 0.07%
>
> I think it is acceptable, your opinion?
>
Yes.
The patchset scares me, but it is nice work! Good optimization and good
clean up.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists