linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] net, wireless: Don't return uninitialized in __cfg80211_stop_sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1309379244.4071.7.camel@jlt3.sipsolutions.net>
Date:	Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:27:24 +0200
From:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:	Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>
Cc:	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
	Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, wireless: Don't return uninitialized in
 __cfg80211_stop_sched_scan()

On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:13 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> If the 'driver_initiated' function argument to
> __cfg80211_stop_sched_scan() is not 0 then we'll return an
> uninitialized 'ret' from the function.

'err'. I also dislike the initialisation, can we just replace the
"return err;" at the end of the function with "return 0;" instead?

Luca, should it maybe be return -ENOENT anyway in the !sched_scan_req
case?

johannes


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/