[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1309379630.1514.122.camel@cumari>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 23:33:50 +0300
From: Luciano Coelho <coelho@...com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Jesper Juhl <jj@...osbits.net>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net, wireless: Don't return uninitialized in
__cfg80211_stop_sched_scan()
On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:27 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 22:13 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> > If the 'driver_initiated' function argument to
> > __cfg80211_stop_sched_scan() is not 0 then we'll return an
> > uninitialized 'ret' from the function.
>
> 'err'. I also dislike the initialisation, can we just replace the
> "return err;" at the end of the function with "return 0;" instead?
Luckily we were never using the return value when passing
driver_initiate =- false.
And I agree with you, there's no use to return err at the end. Better
to simply return 0.
> Luca, should it maybe be return -ENOENT anyway in the !sched_scan_req
> case?
We could do that. I had just thought that stopping a scan that is not
running would just be a NOP, but if you prefer to return an error in
that case, I can do it.
--
Cheers,
Luca.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists