[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110629055102.GG29299@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:51:02 +0200
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Introduce iommu_commit() function
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 02:02:02PM +0900, KyongHo Cho wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:
> > It needs to be called whenever a some code changed a domain (either by
> > attaching/detaching devices or by mapping/unmapping pages in
> > the domain).
>
> Do you mean we can invalidate IOTLB with this iommu_commit()?
> We need to invalidate IOTLB without updating page table for some
> optimized solutions.
>
> If a device in one domain is moved to other domain, IOTLB of the
> device must be invalidated
> because it contains translation information of the previous domain.
The classic use-case is to do a single iommu-tlb flush after a set of
page-table updates, but flushing iotlbs after moving devices is a
potential use-case too, so the answer is yes.
Regards,
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists